On March 26, the three-member expert panel in the RRM case against Canadian Orla Mining company released its findings confirming worker allegations that management at its Camino Rojo mine in Mexico’s Zacatecas state had interfered with their associational rights.
The panel of experts also confirmed that the employer had failed to respond to urgent requests for help from workers who had received death threats because of their support for Los Mineros union, rather than a protection union favoured by the employer. The report was released almost two years after the complaint was filed by Los Mineros.
The Mexican government challenged the panel’s findings, arguing that the threats of violence were a criminal matter beyond the scope of the RRM, and that the mine was not a covered facility under the trinational trade agreement between Mexico, Canada and the United States.
Under the trade agreement, interested parties can file complaints against employers when workers’ associational rights are violated. While most RRM complaints have been resolved relatively quickly with corrective action plans adopted by the employers who violated workers’ rights, the Camino Rojo case demonstrates the urgent need for improvement in the process. |